
Don't use AI to write: AI accelerates; it doesn't replace thinking
AI does not replace thinking or writing the argument; it accelerates research and feedback. SGD B2B flow: brief → human writes → AI questions → Hermes SEO·GEO·AEO.

In LatAm B2B, the pitch is already here: “we’ll optimize you for GEO,” “AI SEO pack,” “get into AI Overviews.” Google Search Central’s official guidance is clearer — and more useful: for Search’s generative features (AI Overviews and AI Mode), the same SEO fundamentals apply. No extra requirements, no special tricks.
At Somos Gente Digital we read it this way: GEO (Generative Engine Optimization — how AI experiences find and cite you) is not a separate magic product. It is people-first SEO done well, with clear technical foundations. This post summarizes what Google says and what you can do on the site this week.
AI Overviews are AI-generated summaries in Google Search results: they help people grasp a complex topic and link to supporting sites. AI Mode is a more conversational experience for nuanced questions, comparisons, or exploration; it also shows links to pages that support the answer.
Both may use “query fan-out”: several related searches in parallel to build a response with more sources. Showing up there does not require new markup; it requires being indexable, snippet-eligible, and genuinely useful.
The AI features guide and the generative AI optimization guide agree on the essentials:
On AEO and GEO: Google treats them as market names for “optimizing for the search experience.” From Google’s perspective, optimizing for generative AI in Search is still SEO. If someone sells you an AEO/GEO “hack,” check it against the official guides.
At SGD we use GEO and AEO when we talk with clients — because that is the channel’s language. But we do not sell “magic AI SEO.” What moves the needle is the same work, with more discipline:
If the pitch is “without this you won’t appear in AI Overviews,” be skeptical. Google is explicit: no special markup or file is required for those features. The real B2B risk is different: recycling other people’s web content and losing your own voice when assistants cite sources. We cover that in AI scraping and GEO.
And if “GEO content” means prompt → publish without thinking through the argument, that clashes with people-first. We said so in Don’t use AI to write.
Concrete actions for owners and teams — without waiting for a three-month “GEO project”:
Measurement tip (when it fits): in Search Console, check the generative AI performance report (impressions in AI Overviews / AI Mode). Use it to decide with data which pages to strengthen — not as an excuse to buy a pack. Official report details.
Not according to Google. You need SEO fundamentals, people-first content, and indexable pages eligible for snippets. Be wary of anyone selling magic without that work.
No. Google says you do not need special files or markup to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode. Useful schema is still the kind that supports rich results and matches what is visible.
No. In LatAm B2B practice they coexist: SEO where the click still matters, and visibility in generative experiences when Google shows AI Overviews or AI Mode. Same quality base.
Google’s free tool for site owners: indexing, queries, pages, and — where available — impressions in Search’s generative AI features.
One idea per URL, your own evidence, real FAQs, human review. AI can help research or question a draft; it should not publish volume without an owner.
If you want a B2B site where SEO·GEO·AEO is a product channel — fundamentals, checklist, and human judgment, not magic packs — let’s talk. See our services: content is part of the product.
FUNDAMENTALS · CHECKLIST · NO MAGIC

AI does not replace thinking or writing the argument; it accelerates research and feedback. SGD B2B flow: brief → human writes → AI questions → Hermes SEO·GEO·AEO.

Open weights ≠ a trustworthy harness. If a coding agent packages the full .git to the vendor cloud, the risk is IP, secrets, and product plans — not only the open file.